Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

Have a good day.


Author Topic: Data Protection & Privacy  (Read 377844 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #60 on: August 31, 2018, 01:00:54 PM »
Collecting NRIC numbers and making copies of the identity card will be illegal from Sept 1, 2019
Hariz Baharudin | 31 August 2018

SINGAPORE - From Sept 1 [2019] next year, it will be illegal for organisations to collect, use or disclose NRIC numbers or make copies of the identity card, under stricter rules spelt out on Friday (Aug 31)[2018] by the Personal Data Protection Commission.

For years, places like shopping malls have collected NRIC numbers when registering customers for lucky draws and memberships or even to track parking redemptions.

But the updated rules mean organisations will no longer be allowed to do that.

Organisations that have collected NRIC numbers are also encouraged to assess if they need to retain these numbers, and if not, are suggested to dispose of them responsibly and in compliance with Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) disposal methods by next year.

Organisations which decide to keep their collection must ensure there is adequate protection. They can also choose to anonymise the NRIC. This follows updates to the rules for such collection under the PDPA, which went fully into force in July 2014.

"In today's digital economy, indiscriminate collection or negligent handling of NRIC numbers can increase the risk of unintended disclosure and may result in NRIC numbers being used for illegal activities such as identity theft or fraud," the commission said in a release on Friday (Aug 31)[2018].

It added that such risks arise as the NRIC number is a permanent and irreplaceable identifier.

Companies were also warned that unless required by the law, physically holding on to an individual's NRIC will not be allowed as well from Sept 1 [2019].

Although the Act already prohibits the indiscriminate collection of consumers' personal data, and requires organisations to account for the use of the data, privacy advocates argued that NRIC details were still being collected, sometimes for frivolous reasons. These ranged from booking a movie ticket to renting a bicycle.

Following public feedback, the privacy watchdog proposed updated guidelines which were then put up for public consultation from November to December last year, before the stricter rules were developed.

There are, however, exceptions.

NRIC numbers or copies of the NRIC can only be obtained or shared if they are required by law, such as when subscribing to a new phone line, making a doctor's appointment or checking into a hotel.

The Personal Data Protection Commission wants consumers to have the right to refuse to hand over their NRIC details in scenarios such as buying movie tickets online.

NRIC details may also be collected when it is necessary to precisely verify an individual's identity "to a high degree of fidelity".

This would include visiting pre-schools or transactions involving healthcare, financial or real estate matters, and when not getting it could risk security or could cause significant harm.

"Where the collection, use and disclosure of NRIC numbers or retention of physical NRICs is permitted, organisations must ensure that adequate protection measures are in place to safeguard the personal data in their possession or under their control, in compliance with their obligations under the PDPA," added the commission.

Organisations that are found flouting the Act can be fined up to $1 million.

These updated rules for NRIC numbers also apply to other national identification numbers, like birth certificate numbers, foreign identification numbers and work permit numbers.

Although passports are periodically replaced, the commission said that organisations should avoid collecting the full passport numbers of individuals as well, unless justified.

It acknowledged that some organisations collect a partial NRIC number and clarified that details of up to the last three numerical digits and letter of the NRIC would not be considered the full NRIC number.

But it added that these partial numbers are still considered personal data under the Act, as it could allow an individual to be identified.

The privacy watchdog reiterated that organisations that collect partial NRIC numbers must still comply with the Act's Data Protection Provisions, and must take steps to make sure this data is secured and not disclosed.

It said it does not prescribe the type of identifiers that organisations can use instead of NRIC numbers, and that organisations are encouraged to assess these alternatives based on their own needs.

Some alternatives it suggested include organisation or user-generated ID, tracking numbers or organisation-issued QR codes.

The commission said it will, together with the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), help organisations adjust by publishing a technical guide on replacing the NRIC number with alternative identifiers.

The commission and IMDA will identify pre-approved technology solutions that companies can take up.

They will also develop template notices that organisations can use to manage customer expectations during this transition period.

Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/collecting-nric-numbers-and-making-copies-of-the-identity-card-will-be-illegal-from-sept-1
Source 2: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/guidelines-on-nric-numbers-companies-9382290
Source 3: https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/pdpc/news/latest-updates/2018/08/updated-nric-advisory-guidelines-now-available




Enlarged version: https://goo.gl/yyVUtZ

Source: https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/pdpc/news/latest-updates/2018/08/update-nric-rules-to-take-effect-from-1-september-2019
« Last Edit: August 31, 2018, 03:58:01 PM by Admin (Rx) »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #61 on: September 08, 2018, 11:19:31 AM »
Dozens of iOS apps secretly collect location history for data monetization, analysis says
By Stephen Silver | Friday, September 07, 2018

GuardianApp, from the Sudo Security Group, finds that a number of iOS apps are secretly collecting and sending location histories and other sensitive user information to third-party data monetization firms.

According to a new report from GuardianApp, "a growing number of iOS apps have been used to covertly collect precise location histories from tens of millions of mobile devices, using packaged code provided by data monetization firms. In many cases, the packaged tracking code may run at all times, constantly sending user GPS coordinates and other information."

The information being collected includes Bluetooth LE Beacon Data, GPS Longitude and Latitude, Wi-Fi SSD and BSSID, and also such information as accelerometer data, battery charge performance and status, and even timestamps for departure/arrival to a location.

GuardianApp lists 24 apps that are "confirmed to send data to a third-party data monetization firm," including ASKfm: Ask Anonymous Questions, C25K 5K Trainer, Classifieds 2.0 Marketplace, Code Scanner by ScanLife, Coupon Sherpa, GasBuddy, Homes.com, Mobiletag, Moco, My Aurora Forecast, MyRadar NOAA Weather Radar, PayByPhone Parking, Perfect365, Photobucket, QuakeFeed Earthquake Alerts, Roadtrippers, ScoutLook Hunting, SnipSnap Coupon App, Tapatalk, The Coupons App, Tunity, Weather Live and YouMail.

GuardianApp has also found code from the monetization firm, RevealMobile, on the apps of several local TV stations owned by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, Tribune Broadcasting Company, LIN Television Corp., Gray Television Group and other broadcasters.

GuardianApp suggests using Apple's built-in Limit Ad Tracking feature to mitigate potential location sharing. The tool can be enabled by navigating to Settings > Privacy > Advertising. Further, vigilant users can select "Don't Allow" when iOS Location Services popup windows instructs them to "See privacy policy" or take similar action. The firm also suggests using a generic name for the SSID of a home Wi-Fi router and switching Bluetooth off when not in use.

Earlier on Friday, two major news stories broke about user data. Adware Doctor, formerly the top paid app in the Mac App Store, was pulled after a security researcher revealed it was exfiltrating user information to China, while a separate investigation revealed other malicious apps in the Mac App Store.

Source: https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/09/07/dozens-of-ios-apps-secretly-collect-location-history-for-data-monetization-analysis-says

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #62 on: September 13, 2018, 07:48:34 AM »
Online NRIC generators a 'cause for concern', cybersecurity experts say
Aqil Haziq Mahmud | 09 Sep 2018

SINGAPORE: While the Government has issued new guidelines against indiscriminate collection of NRIC details, cybersecurity experts have highlighted a different kind of personal data threat: random NRIC generators. 

From September 2019, the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) said organisations can only collect, use or disclose NRIC numbers or NRIC copies "under certain specific circumstances".

But a quick online search by Channel NewsAsia turned up at least two random NRIC generators that can produce "valid" NRIC numbers that are "verified against published checking logic".

Both only required a user to input the desired NRIC number's first letter and corresponding range of birth years before churning out the digits.

When announcing the new NRIC guidelines in August, the PDPC had said that the NRIC number is a "permanent and irreplaceable identifier which can be used to unlock large amounts of information relating to an individual".


Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #63 on: October 17, 2018, 04:42:25 PM »
Ex-ambulance driver fined $1,500 for OSA offence by taking photo of dead body while on duty
Sep 11, 2018 | Fabian Koh

An ambulance driver took a picture of a dead body while attending to a case of a maid who had hanged herself in February last year.

He sent the photo on his mobile phone to his colleagues, and it soon found its way onto social media.

Shaik Haziq Fahmi Shaik Nasair Johar, 29, was working for private ambulance operator Unistrong Technology, which has a contract with the Government for its services.

Yesterday, Haziq, since dismissed from his job, was fined $1,500 under the Official Secrets Act (OSA).

His former colleague, paramedic Nurizzah Afiqah Hussain, 27, was fined $3,000 last month for her role in disseminating the photo by sending it to her then boyfriend. She has also been sacked by Unistrong.

The incident came to light after the maid's employer became aware of the photograph's existence, and informed the investigating officer for the case.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Serene Yap told the court that Haziq was on duty on Feb 1 last year at Marine Parade Fire Post when a message came in from the control room.

The maid's employer had called the police to inform them that the maid had hanged herself while the family was overseas for five days.

Haziq and his team, including Nurizzah, then went to the apartment of the dead woman's employer.

While there, he used his mobile phone to take a photo of the body, as Nurizzah shone a torchlight on it.

It was his first time attending to a case of hanging and he wanted to share the picture in a chat group with his colleagues, although he was not authorised to do so, according to DPP Yap.

Former paramedic fined for unlawfully sending photo of dead maid to boyfriend

Nurizzah, who was in that chat group, later sent the photo to her then boyfriend, who forwarded it to another chat group.

The agent of the dead maid found out about the photo on social media, and told the employer. Shocked, the employer informed the investigating officer, who lodged a report.

The police began investigating, and on Feb 4 last year, Haziq was arrested at his home in Chai Chee Road. His mobile phone was also seized for investigations.

Defence lawyer Amarick Gill said in mitigation that Haziq already had his contract with Unistrong terminated and was remorseful for his actions. When Haziq took the photo, he had intended to send it only to his teammates, and did not personally disseminate it publicly, Mr Gill added.

In sentencing, District Judge Marvin Bay called Haziq's actions "deeply disturbing".

"Your act can cause intense anguish to the family of the deceased, who would be expected to be in a state of grief and shock in the light of her sudden and unnatural demise," he said.

He added that Haziq's actions intruded on the privacy of the family of the dead maid's employer too.

For the offence under the OSA, Haziq could have been jailed for up to two years and fined up to $2,000.

Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/ex-ambulance-driver-fined-1500-for-osa-offence

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #64 on: October 18, 2018, 09:34:00 PM »
72 HealthHub accounts suspected hacked, e-service shut down for 6 days
Irene Tham | 18 Oct 2018

SINGAPORE - About 70 HealthHub accounts were suspected to have been hacked recently, prompting a six-day shutdown of the e-service in early October.

The attack on HealthHub - a gateway to citizens' medical records, prescriptions and clinic appointments - came on the heels of a cyber attack on SingHealth in June. That attack led to Singapore's biggest data breach, involving the personal data of 1.5 million SingHealth patients.

In a statement on Thursday (Oct 18), the Health Promotion Board (HPB) and Integrated Health Information Systems (IHiS) said they started investigations after a user reported that her e-mail account had been used to access the portal without her authorisation.

IHiS - an agency that manages the IT systems of all public healthcare institutions, including the HealthHub portal - then discovered unusual increased traffic to HealthHub on Sept 28 and Oct 3, 8 and 9.

Log-in attempts were made with more than 27,000 unique e-mail addresses, of which 72 matched those of HealthHub users. These 72 accounts were also suspected to have been breached.

Nevertheless, IHiS and HPB said there was "no evidence of a breach in the HealthHub system".

Also, illegal access was limited to the basic tier of HealthHub, which contains users' self-populated profiles and any Healthpoints accumulated through participation in HPB programmes.

Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/72-healthhub-accounts-suspected-hacked-leading-to-shut-down-of-e-service-for-6-days

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #65 on: November 14, 2018, 05:39:42 PM »
Millions of Passengers Hit in Worst Ever Airline Data Hack
By Kyunghee Park and Jinshan Hong | October 25, 2018

Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. said a hacker accessed personal information of 9.4 million customers, becoming the target of the world’s biggest airline data breach.

The airline’s shares sank the most in almost two years, shaving $201 million off its market value, after the Hong Kong-based carrier disclosed the unauthorized access late Wednesday, seven months after discovering the violation. While passports, addresses and emails were exposed, flight safety wasn’t compromised and there was no evidence any information has been misused, it said, without revealing details of the origin of the attack.

“This is quite shocking,” said Shukor Yusof, founder of aviation consulting firm Endau Analytics in Malaysia. “It’s probably the biggest breach of information in the aviation sector.”

Affecting more people than the population of Cathay Pacific’s home base of Hong Kong, the hack is in another league to breaches reported by British Airways Plc and Delta Air Lines Inc. this year. Those carriers boosted spending on cybersecurity after hacks, which saw personal and financial information of hundreds of thousands of customers illegally accessed.

“At this point, we believe it is uncertain if Cathay Pacific would be liable to any fines imposed by government authorities for such a breach,” Geoffrey Cheng, an analyst at Bocom International Holdings Co., wrote in a research note Thursday. “However, we expect the share price jitters to linger on for a while.”

The data breach at Cathay -- a partner of British Airways in the Oneworld airline alliance -- adds to the carrier’s woes, with Chief Executive Officer Rupert Hogg trying to turn it around after two straight annual losses.

“I’m truly sorry for the concern this may have caused you,” Hogg said, addressing customers in a video posted to the carrier’s website.

For the majority of people affected, the hackers accessed a combination of passenger name, and either phone number or email, Hogg said. No one’s travel, Asia Miles or Marco Polo Club loyalty program profiles were accessed in full, and no passwords were compromised, he said. Cathay Pacific is notifying affected passengers, and will provide free ID monitoring to those who request it, he said.

“Upon discovery, we acted immediately to contain the event and to thoroughly investigate,” Hogg said. “We engaged one of the world’s leading cybersecurity firms to assist us, and we further strengthened our IT security systems too.”

Shares of Cathay Pacific tumbled 3.8 percent in Hong Kong on Thursday, the biggest loss since January 2017.
What got exposed?

    Names, nationalities, dates of birth, telephone numbers, email, physical addresses, numbers for passports, identity cards and frequent-flier programs, and historical travel information.
    403 expired credit card numbers
    27 credit numbers with no CVV, or a security code
    About 860,000 passport numbers
    245,000 Hong Kong IDs

Hong Kong’s privacy commissioner expressed serious concern over the leak and said the office will initiate a compliance check with the airline. A dedicated website, infosecurity.cathaypacific.com, provides information about the event and what affected passengers should do next.

    We have discovered unauthorised access to some of our passenger data. For Data Security Event support, please DM @cxinfosec for assistance.
    — Cathay Pacific (@cathaypacific) October 24, 2018

Some local lawmakers criticized Cathay for taking so long to reveal the breach. Lam Cheuk-ting, a member of the Legislative Council’s security committee, told reporters that many people in Hong Kong are angry and the airline should’ve taken the initiative the very first day it found out. Cathay’s Chief Customer and Commercial Officer Paul Loo said the airline wanted to have accurate grasp on the situation and didn’t wish to “create unnecessary panic,” AFP reported.

Upon discovery, Cathay said it took immediate action to contain the event and started a “thorough” probe with the assistance of a cybersecurity firm and bolstered its network security.

British Airways said the hack on its system lasted for more than two weeks during the months of August and September, compromising credit-card data of some 380,000 customers. Delta said in April that cyberattack on a contractor last year exposed the payment information of “several hundred thousand customers.”

Facebook Says 14 Million Users Had Intimate Data Hacked

Cathay is in the midst of a three-year transformation program, as part of which Hogg has reduced jobs starting with the carrier’s head office in Hong Kong to cut costs and introduced better business-class services on long-haul flights to help lure premium passengers.

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-25/cathay-pacific-reports-data-breach-affecting-9-4-million-fliers
« Last Edit: January 18, 2019, 02:57:27 PM by Admin (Rx) »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #66 on: November 28, 2018, 10:38:38 PM »
223 State Courts online case files accessed without authorisation due to loophole
Lydia Lam | 28 Nov 2018

SINGAPORE: Electronic case files in the State Courts' online management system were viewed by up to nine unauthorised people who exploited a loophole in the system, the courts said in a statement on Wednesday (Nov 28).

This was the first time that the State Courts had encountered such an incident, a spokesman said in response to media queries.

The Integrated Criminal Case Filing and Management System (ICMS) is a system used to document criminal cases.

The State Courts were alerted to a possible vulnerability in the system on Nov 1.

A total of 223 electronic case files were accessed over the course of the year (2018). Most of them (89 per cent) were concluded cases, while the rest were ongoing cases.

Data accessed from the files included names, personal identity information, addresses, gender of the accused, information about the offences, as well as the status of the case.

"Immediate steps were taken to fix the vulnerability," said the State Courts. "The e-case files had not been tampered with, and the integrity of ongoing proceedings was not affected."

The type of cases accessed by the individuals included criminal cases, coroner's inquiries, magistrate's complaints and a youth court case.

"Our review suggests that this is not a hacking incident and we do not currently have reason to believe that the unauthorised access activities were coordinated," said the State Courts spokesman.

The vulnerability was not found in its other online case filing management systems.

ICMS is used by lawyers, the media and accused persons, with different layers of access for each group of users.

While the State Courts did not have information on the number of ICMS users, the spokesman said there were about 190,000 cases in the system as of Nov 19.

Those who have been accused of crimes can access the ICMS Accused Person portal with a valid account through SingPass authentication.

Preliminary findings show that a few such accused persons exploited a loophole in the ICMS system which allowed them to view court documents in other e-case files.

While the State Courts did not elaborate on what the loophole was, the spokesman said it was patched to prevent unauthorised access to court documents within 12 hours of being alerted to it.

They also reported the matter to the police.

Along with their system vendor Ecquaria Technologies, the State Courts implemented additional measures to protect the security and confidentiality of the information in ICMS by enhancing user access controls within the system.

Investigations by the police are ongoing and letters have been sent to all parties affected.

The State Courts said they have set up a dedicated email (query@statecourts.gov.sg) and hotline (6435 5651) to address queries.

They said that they take a serious view of any unauthorised access of information in their case management systems and will do what is necessary to prevent similar incidents from occurring.

Source: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/223-state-courts-online-case-files-accessed-without-10976490

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #67 on: December 12, 2018, 08:07:04 AM »
Marriott hack hits 500 million Starwood guests
30 November 2018

The records of 500 million customers of the hotel group Marriott International have been involved in a data breach.

The hotel chain said the guest reservation database of its Starwood division had been compromised by an unauthorised party.

It said an internal investigation found an attacker had been able to access the Starwood network since 2014.

The company said it would notify customers whose records were in the database.

Marriott International bought Starwood in 2016, creating the largest hotel chain in the world with more than 5,800 properties.

Starwood's hotel brands include W Hotels, Sheraton, Le Méridien and Four Points by Sheraton. Marriott-branded hotels use a separate reservation system on a different network.

Marriott said it was alerted by an internal security tool that somebody was attempting to access the Starwood database. After investigating, it discovered that an "unauthorised party had copied and encrypted information".

It said it believed its database contained records of up to 500 million customers.

For about 327 million guests, the information included "some combination" of:
o name
o address
o phone number
o email address
o passport number
o account information
o date of birth
o gender
o arrival and departure information

It said some records also included encrypted payment card information, but it could not rule out the possibility that the encryption keys had also been stolen.

"We deeply regret this incident happened," the company said in a statement.

"Marriott reported this incident to law enforcement and continues to support their investigation. The company has already begun notifying regulatory authorities."

The company has set up a website to give affected customers more information. It will also offer customers in the US and some other countries a year-long subscription to a fraud-detecting service.

In a statement, the UK's Information Commissioner's Office said: "We have received a data breach report from Marriott involving its Starwood Hotels and will be making enquiries. If anyone has concerns about how their data has been handled they can report these concerns to us."
What should I do if I'm affected?

The Marriott group said it would contact affected customers whose email addresses were in the Starwood reservation database.

The database contained details of reservations made on or before 10 September 2018.

The company has set up a dedicated help website for those affected and is also operating a free helpline. For UK customers the number is 0808 189 1065.

Marriott is not certain whether the attackers were able to obtain payment information, so be aware of any suspicious transactions on your account.

Also be aware that scammers may be sending out mass emails pretending to represent the Marriott group.

The company says it will not include attachments in its notification emails and will not ask for personal information over email. If in doubt, call the helpline.

The company is offering affected customers a year-long subscription to a fraud-checking service.
Analysis

by Chris Fox, technology reporter

It's not the biggest data breach we've ever seen (that dubious honour goes to Yahoo!) but it's certainly up there with some of the worst.

Not only were up to 500 million customer records accessed and potentially copied, but the attackers had had unauthorised access since 2014.

And even though payment card information was encrypted, the company thinks the key may have been stolen too.

The UK's data regulator has confirmed it is investigating, and so the threat of a whopping GDPR penalty looms.

Although the Marriott group's headquarters are in the US, it has to comply with the EU's GDPR rules when dealing with citizens in the EU.

The way it has disclosed this breach, notified customers and offered fraud-checking services will certainly help its cause.

But the ICO and other international regulators may rule the company has been too slow to act.

As always with a big data breach, be aware that scammers may send out emails claiming to be from the Marriott group.

The hotel chain says it will not send any notification emails with attachments, and will not request any information from its customers by email.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46401890
« Last Edit: January 02, 2019, 10:42:54 PM by Admin (Rx) »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #68 on: December 12, 2018, 08:13:48 AM »
Quora says 100 million users may have been affected by data breach
Catherine Shu@catherineshu | 3 Dec 2018

Quora said today that a security breach may have compromised data from about 100 million users. In an email sent to users today and a blog post by CEO Adam D’Angelo, the company said a “malicious third party” gained unauthorized access to Quora’s systems on Friday. Its internal security teams and a “leading digital forensics and security firm” are currently investigating the breach. Law enforcement officials have also been notified.

The company believes it has identified the root cause of the breach and “taken steps to address the issue, although our investigation is ongoing and we’ll continue to make security improvements.” Quora also added that anonymous questions and answers were not affected by the breach because it does not store the identities of people who make anonymous postings.

The company is currently notifying users whose data was compromised and logging out all Quora users who may have been affected as a security precaution. It is also invalidating their passwords if they used one. A FAQ about the breach has been set up here.

According to Quora, the following user data may have been accessed:

        Account and user information, e.g. name, email, IP, user ID, encrypted password, user account settings, personalization data

        Public actions and content including drafts, e.g. questions, answers, comments, blog posts, upvotes

        Data imported from linked networks when authorized by you, e.g. contacts, demographic information, interests, access tokens (now invalidated)

        Non-public actions, e.g. answer requests, downvotes, thanks

        Non-public content, e.g. direct messages, suggested edits

In another article on its help center, Quora said “it is confident that no partner’s financial information has been compromised.” Some access tokens associated with Stripe, the payment processing service used by the company, were “temporarily compromised,” but Quora confirmed with Stripe that no access tokens have been used since the incident and no financial information was breached.

All users with Stripe accounts have also had their access tokens reset. “We are confident that no personal financial information that was accessible through Stripe has been compromised. Furthermore, no personal financial information is currently vulnerable,” Quora said.

Source: https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/03/quora-says-100-million-users-may-have-been-affected-by-data-breach/
« Last Edit: January 02, 2019, 10:44:45 PM by Admin (Rx) »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #69 on: December 12, 2018, 08:22:22 AM »
Another Google+ data bug exposes info for 52.5 million users
Google will shut the service down in April of 2019 instead of August as initially planned.
Andrew Tarantola | 10 Dec 2018

Google's semi-defunct social media platform Google+ has suffered its second data breach in three months and, as a result, will be completely shuttered in April, four months earlier than previously planned.

In October, Google revealed that it had found a major security bug potentially impacting around a half million Google+ users. The company at that point made the decision to shut down the service the following August. Last month, Google once again spotted a security issue, on that could potentially serve up the personal information of some 52.5 million users -- including names, email address, occupation, gender, birthday, relationship status and age, whether they were set to public or not -- to developers using the Google+ API. This was the final straw for the company, which has announced that the service will shut down four months early and its API will cease functioning within 90 days.

While the API bug did potentially impact tens of millions of users, Google asserts that it has found no evidence of the exploit being acted upon or the data being misused. What's more, the security hole has already been patched so the service's few remaining fans will be able to enjoy it, at least until the spring.

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/12/10/google-plus-data-leak-info-52-5-millionGoogle Source (2nd breach, Dec 2018): https://www.blog.google/technology/safety-security/expediting-changes-google-plus/
1st breach (Oct 2018): https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/08/google-plus-hack/

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #70 on: January 02, 2019, 05:40:00 PM »
Potential data breach after travel agency employee loses hard disk
Disk contains names, mailing addresses and NRIC details of more than 200 clients
David Sun | Dec 19, 2018

The authorities are investigating a potential data breach after a travel agency employee lost a hard disk containing personal details of clients.

The employee of Insight Vacations had taken the disk out of the office without authorisation and lost it in a taxi on the way home.

The disk, which has not been recovered, contains the names, mailing addresses and NRIC details of more than 200 clients, as well as the names, mailing addresses and mobile numbers of more than 5,000 people on the agency's mailing lists.

The incident came to light only after the agency recently conducted an internal review of best practices for data protection.

A spokesman for Insight Vacations told The New Paper yesterday the employee was reprimanded and has since resigned.

"We immediately reported the incident to the relevant authorities after we discovered the accidental loss as we felt it was important to take a proactive approach to alerting those affected on the risks of someone misusing their mobile number or mailing address," she said.

"We value the importance of our guests' privacy and, as a company, regularly review policies regarding customer data privacy."

She said there had been no indication that any personal data had been accessed or used inappropriately, but the company wanted to be accountable to its clients and the public.

"Insight Vacations and our parent company, The Travel Corporation, take security of customer data seriously and regret that this incident has happened," she said.

"We have extensive policies and procedures governing the security of customers' personal information, including the use of portable data storage devices, and are conducting a thorough review of potentially affected records and taking measures to further improve our data security going forward."

Insight Vacations said it will be engaging third-party experts on data privacy and system security, and is implementing mandatory training for employees provided by a global data security training provider.

A spokesman for the Personal Data Protection Commission said it is investigating after it was notified of the incident.

Insight Vacations e-mailed its clients and people on its mailing lists yesterday to inform them that it was actively monitoring for indications of information being leaked.

The e-mail also assured them that it had taken the necessary steps and are committed to protecting the information.

The recipients were advised to take precautionary steps to avoid falling victim to fraudulent activities.

Mr Steven Wong, 63, an office manager who received the e-mail, said he had provided his details when he took part in a contest by Insight Vacations.

"I actually found it amusing that someone left the hard disk in a taxi," he said.

Singapore had its most serious data breach in June when the personal data of 1.5 million SingHealth patients was compromised. Noting this and other breaches, Mr Wong said the public should know by now to be more alert of scams.

He said: "I don't know the extent of this new potential breach, but people should always be on the alert of identity theft and scams."

Source: https://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore/potential-data-breach-after-travel-agency-employee-loses-hard-disk
« Last Edit: January 02, 2019, 05:41:51 PM by Admin (Rx) »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #71 on: January 07, 2019, 01:42:16 PM »
Personal details of 284 KrisFlyer members disclosed due to software bug: SIA
Jan 6, 2019 | Tee Zhuo

SINGAPORE - Personal details of over 280 KrisFlyer members may have been seen by other customers due to a software bug affecting Singapore Airlines’ (SIA) website on Friday (Jan 4).

“We have been made aware of a number of cases in which a customer logged in to his or her KrisFlyer account, under certain specific conditions, may have been able to see selective details of another customer,” an SIA spokesman said in response to queries.

These details may have included names, e-mail addresses, account numbers, membership tier statuses, KrisFlyer miles and rewards, travel history and in seven cases, passport details.

The spokesman added that the breach occurred when any two members log in to their KrisFlyer accounts and access transactions displaying their membership information at the same time, while also being assigned the same server by the system.

On Saturday, Facebook user Tricia Leo said in a post that when she logged into her KrisFlyer account, she realised that she could see another person’s e-mail address on her profile page.

“I tried a new login and I could see his entire history, upcoming trips, miles,” she wrote.

“If organisations that demand our personal data don’t guard our information properly, then they need to be called out on it.”

In a statement, SIA said that no changes were made to members’ accounts and no credit card details were disclosed.

Investigations based on system logs determined 284 cases in total, it added.

“We have established that this was a one-off software bug and was not the result of an external party’s breach of our systems or members’ accounts,” SIA said.

"The issue has been resolved and we will carry out a detailed review to ensure this will not happen again."

The software bug arose from a change to SIA’s website homepage on Friday, and the incident occurred between about 2am and 12.15pm.

SIA said that it is following up directly with affected customers, and has voluntarily informed the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC).

A PDPC spokesman confirmed that it had been notified of the incident, and added that the commission was looking into it.

“The protection of our customers’ personal data is of utmost importance to SIA, and we sincerely regret the incident,” SIA added.

This comes after a number of data leak incidents here last year.

The Straits Times reported in August that over 4,300 Shangri-La International Hotel Management rewards club members had details like names and e-mail addresses leaked, including "a small number" of Singapore customers.

In July, ST reported that some 3,000 RedMart customers were affected by a data breach that leaked their e-mail addresses and put them at risk of phishing.

The same month, it was reported that Singapore suffered its worst cyber attack when hackers stole personal particulars of over 1.5 million patients from SingHealth.

Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/personal-details-of-284-krisflyer-members-disclosed-due-to-software-bug-sia

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #72 on: January 11, 2019, 07:54:42 PM »
Public Report of the Committee of Inquiry (COI) into the cyber attack on Singapore Health Services Private Limited Patient Database

10 January 2019 - The Committee of Inquiry (COI)#, convened to inquire into the events and contributing factors leading to the cyber attack on Singapore Health Services Private Limited (SingHealth)’s patient database system, has released its public report.

# Convened on 24 July 2018, the chairman of the COI is Retired Senior (subsequently termed Chief) District Judge Mr Richard R Magnus. The other members of the Committee are Mr Lee Fook Sun, Director and Chairman of Ensign InfoSecurity; Mr T K Udairam, Group Chief Operating Officer of Sheares Healthcare Management Pte Ltd; and Ms Cham Hui Fong, Assistant Secretary-General of the National Trades Union Congress.

Source: https://www.mci.gov.sg/coireport
PDF of the report (454 pages): https://goo.gl/J3F71E
Cache of the report: https://goo.gl/vuUG5D


IHiS fined record S$750,000, SingHealth with S$250,000 for Singapore's worst data breach
Jan 15, 2019 - 12:40 PM

SINGAPORE'S privacy watchdog has meted out its largest fine of S$750,000 to Integrated Health Information Systems (IHiS) for lapses in securing patient data which resulted in the nation's worst data breach.

The cyber attack on SingHealth in June 2018 compromised the personal information of 1.5 million patients, including Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Even though IHiS is the technology vendor for Singapore's healthcare sector, SingHealth also has to take responsibility as the owner of the patient database system - a point that the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) stressed in dishing out penalties.

As such, SingHealth was fined S$250,000, the second largest here.

In a statement on Tuesday, the PDPC said: "Even if organisations delegate work to vendors, organisations as data controllers must ultimately take responsibility for the personal data that they have collected from their customers."
SEE ALSO: SingHealth data breach probe reveals 'blanket' of basic failings

Singapore's privacy watchdog also found the person handling security incidents involving SingHealth to be unfamiliar with the incident response process. He failed to take further steps to investigate and understand reports on suspicious activities, it noted.

The PDPC was referring to the key technology risk man at IHiS - cluster information security officer Wee Jia Huo - who was in charge of the SingHealth cluster.

In a public report issued last week by the Committee of Inquiry probing the cyber attack, Mr Wee was said to have displayed "an alarming lack of concern" when it was clear that a critical system had been potentially breached.

IHiS and SingHealth are wholly owned subsidiaries of MOH Holdings, the holding company through which the Singapore Government owns the corporatised institutions in the public healthcare sector.

It was reported on Monday that IHiS had fired two employees and redeployed its technology risk man. Mr Wee, whose job was to decide if upper management should be alerted about incidents, was demoted and redeployed to another role.

IHiS would also impose "significant financial penalty" on five members of its senior management team, including chief executive officer Bruce Liang.

Those found to be in breach of the Personal Data Protection Act in Singapore could be fined up to S$1 million. Karaoke bar chain K Box was among the first batch of organisations punished for breaking the law. It was fined S$50,000 over an incident in September 2014 that saw the data of 317,000 customers leaked.

Source: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/ihis-fined-record-s750000-singhealth-with-s250000-for-singapores-worst-data
« Last Edit: January 15, 2019, 02:20:53 PM by Admin (Rx) »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #73 on: January 13, 2019, 05:52:27 PM »
The Multi-Billion Dollar Industry That Makes Its Living From Your Data


Enlarged version: https://goo.gl/QzVHvt
Source: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/personal-data-ecosystem

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #74 on: January 28, 2019, 10:43:58 PM »
UNAUTHORISED POSSESSION AND DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FROM HIV REGISTRY
28th Jan 2019

1. Following an alert by the Police, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has ascertained that confidential information regarding 14,200 individuals diagnosed with HIV up to January 2013, and 2,400 of their contacts, is in the possession of an unauthorised person. The information has been illegally disclosed online. We have worked with the relevant parties to disable access to the information.

2. We are sorry for the anxiety and distress caused by this incident. Our priority is the wellbeing of the affected individuals. Since 26 January, we have been progressively contacting the individuals to notify them and render assistance.

3. On 22 January, MOH was notified by the Police that confidential information from MOH’s HIV Registry[1] may have been disclosed by an unauthorised person. MOH made a Police report on 23 January. On 24 January, MOH ascertained that the information matched the HIV Registry’s records up to January 2013.From 24 to 25 January, MOH worked with the relevant parties to disable access to the information.

4. The records were those of 5,400 Singaporeans diagnosed with HIV up to January 2013 and 8,800 foreigners[2] diagnosed with HIV up to December 2011. The information included their name, identification number, contact details (phone number and address), HIV test results and related medical information. The name, identification number, phone number and address of 2,400 individuals identified through contact tracing up to May 2007 were also included.

5. While access to the confidential information has been disabled, it is still in the possession of the unauthorised person, and could still be publicly disclosed in the future. We are working with relevant parties to scan the Internet for signs of further disclosure of the information.

Background

6. The confidential information is in the illegal possession of one Mikhy K Farrera Brochez, a male US citizen who was residing in Singapore, on an employment pass, between January 2008 and June 2016. Brochez was remanded in Prison in June 2016. He was convicted of numerous fraud and drug-related offences in March 2017, and sentenced to 28 months’ imprisonment. The fraud offences were in relation to Brochez lying about his HIV status to the Ministry of Manpower, in order to obtain and maintain his employment pass, furnishing false information to Police officers during a criminal investigation, and using forged degree certificates in job applications. Upon completing his sentence, Brochez was deported from Singapore. He currently remains outside Singapore.

7. Brochez was a partner of Ler Teck Siang, a male Singaporean doctor. As the Head of MOH’s National Public Health Unit (NPHU) from March 2012 to May 2013, Ler had authority to access information in the HIV Registry as required for his work. Ler resigned in January 2014. He was charged in Court in June 2016 for offences under the Penal Code and the Official Secrets Act (OSA). In September 2018, Ler was convicted of abetting Brochez to commit cheating, and also of providing false information to the Police and MOH. He was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment. Ler has appealed, and his appeal is scheduled to be heard in March 2019. In addition, Ler has been charged under the OSA for failing to take reasonable care of confidential information regarding HIV-positive patients. Ler’s charge under the OSA is pending before the Courts.

8. In May 2016, MOH had lodged a Police report after receiving information that Brochez was in possession of confidential information that appeared to be from the HIV Registry. Their properties were searched, and all relevant material found were seized and secured by the Police.

9. In May 2018, after Brochez had been deported from Singapore, MOH received information that Brochez still had part of the records he had in 2016. The information did not appear to have been disclosed in any public manner. MOH lodged a police report, and contacted the affected individuals to notify them.

10. On 22 January 2019, MOH was notified that more information from the HIV Registry could still be in the illegal possession of Brochez. On this occasion, he had disclosed the information online.

11. Brochez is currently under Police investigation for various offences, and the authorities are seeking assistance from their foreign counterparts.

12. This incident is believed to have arisen from the mishandling of information by Ler, who is suspected of not having complied with the policies and guidelines on the handling of confidential information. MOH takes a grave view of such matters, and will not hesitate to take stern action against staff and other individuals who abuse their authority and access to confidential information, or fail to handle such information in a proper manner.

Additional Safeguards in Disease Registries

13. Since 2016, additional safeguards against mishandling of information by authorised staff have been put in place. For example, a two-person approval process to download and decrypt Registry information was implemented in September 2016, to ensure that the information cannot be accessed by a single person. A workstation specifically configured and locked down to prevent unauthorised information removal was designated for processing of sensitive information from the HIV Registry. The use of unauthorised portable storage devices on official computers was disabled in MOH in 2017, as part of a government-wide policy.

14. MOH will continue to regularly review our systems to ensure that they remain secure and that the necessary safeguards are in place.

15. We appeal to members of the public to notify MOH immediately should they come across information related to this incident, and not further share it. Members of the public who have such information or other concerns can contact our hotline at 6325 9220.


[1] The HIV Registry contains information concerning individuals diagnosed with HIV, a notifiable disease under the Infectious Diseases Act (IDA). MOH relies on information from the Registry to monitor the HIV infection situation, conduct contact tracing in relation to HIV patients and assess disease prevention and management measures.

[2] This includes work and visit pass applicants/ holders.

Source: https://www.moh.gov.sg/news-highlights/details/unauthorised-possession-and-disclosure-of-information-from-hiv-registry



HIV data leak: What we know about Mikhy Farrera Brochez
By Afifah Darke | 28 Jan 2019

SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Health (MOH) on Monday (Jan 28) announced
that the HIV-positive status and personal information of 14,200 people
from Singapore’s HIV registry were leaked online by US citizen Mikhy Farrera Brochez, who had previously worked here as a
lecturer in two polytechnics.

Brochez, who was deported in April last year, was jailed in 2016 for
lying about his HIV status to gain an employment pass.

The 32-year-old, who was also convicted of fraud and drug-related
offences, was sentenced to 28 months’ jail.

Here’s what we know about him:

*HOW DID BROCHEZ LEAK THE INFORMATION? *

Brochez was the romantic partner of Ler Teck Siang, a male Singaporean
doctor who was the former head of the National Public Health Unit
at the Ministry of Health (MOH) between March 2012 and May 2013.

According to court documents, the couple started living together in
Singapore in 2008. They got married in New York City on Apr 24, 2014.

As head of MOH's National Public Health Unit, Ler had authority to
access information in the HIV Registry as required for his work, said MOH.

Ler, who resigned in January 2014, is believed to have mishandled the
information and is suspected of not having complied with the policies
and guidelines on the handling of such confidential information.

In May 2016, MOH lodged a police report after receiving information that
Brochez was in possession of confidential information that appeared to
be from the HIV Registry.

Police searched the couple's properties and relevant material was seized
as well.

In May 2018, after Brochez had been deported from Singapore, MOH
received information that he still had part of the records. While the
information did not appear to have been made public, MOH lodged a police
report and contacted the affected individuals to inform them.

On Jan 22 this year, MOH was notified by the police that Brochez may
still have more information from the HIV Registry, and had leaked it online.

*HOW DID BROCHEZ ENTER SINGAPORE? *

Ler helped Brochez, who was HIV-positive, dupe the Ministry of Manpower
(MOM) into issuing the American an employment pass.

On two separate occasions, Ler gave a sample of his own blood to be
submitted so that Brochez could hide his HIV status.

The first instance was in March 2008 for a compulsory medical test
required by the MOM for issuing the employment pass.

Brochez, who suspected he was HIV-positive, knew that he would not be
granted an employment pass if MOM knew his medical status, court
documents showed.

Ler suggested submitting his blood in Brochez's name to MOM in order to
yield a negative result.

On the morning of Mar 13, Ler drew his own blood at home and stored it
in a test tube.

Ler, who was a locum general practitioner at My Family Clinic at
Commonwealth that day, brought the test tube to work with him.

When Brochez visited the clinic that evening for a blood test, Ler
labelled the test tube with Brochez's particulars and submitted it for
testing.

As a result, the test came back negative and MOM issued an employment
pass to Brochez.

In October 2013, MOM received information that Brochez was HIV positive
and directed him to cancel the personalised employment pass he had
obtained in Feb 2011.

Brochez responded by saying that he had been falsely accused and told
MOM he would supply "proof of being free of HIV".

To prevent the pass from being cancelled, the couple repeated the ruse
they had used in 2008 at the clinic Ler was working at at that time.

As a result, MOM allowed him to retain his pass.

According to court documents, Brochez said he and Ler were in love and
the only way for them to be together was to commit the offences due to
the “discriminatory” laws.

He also claimed that he posed no public health risk as he had been
taking antivirals since 2008.

*WHAT ELSE DID HE FAKE? *

When police raided Brochez's residence, they seized several certificates
purportedly issued to him, said court documents.

This included a linguistics degree from Vanderbilt University, a
Master’s degree in developmental and child psychology as well as a
doctorate in psychology and education from the University of Paris. A
professional teaching certificate was also seized.

Investigations revealed that all the certificates were forged and that
Brochez neither attended the institutions nor obtained the qualifications.

He had used the certificates to apply for jobs with educational
institutions in Singapore.

Authorities also found a Bahamian passport with the name Malatesta da
Farrera-Brochez in a safe.

Though the passport bore the same birth date and photograph of Brochez
as shown in his US passport, police confirmed that it was a fake.

During his work in Singapore, Brochez received multiple awards and
recognition for teaching excellence. He also published articles in
scientific journals and books on child psychology.

Brochez has also represented Singapore at international conferences for
academia and research.

In a 2010 interview with a local newspaper, Brochez claimed that he was
enrolled in Princeton University at the age of 13. However, he
transferred to Vanderbilt University in his first year because he felt
the latter offered better linguistic courses.

In the interview, Brochez said he could converse in eight
languages, including Hebrew and Spanish, saying that he was "a gifted
child".

Brochez claimed he was a successful "laboratory rat" of his mother, a Dr
Theresa King, who was purportedly a renowned professor of child and
adolescent psychology in the UK.

"My mother is a really big influence in my life. I would not have made
it without all her help and guidance," he had said in the interview.

However, according to British daily The Independent, there was no
psychologist with such qualifications under the name given by Brochez.

When The Independent contacted a UK-registered psychologist who
qualified under the name given by Brochez, the news site was told that
Brochez was not her son, and that she did not specialise in any of the
relevant areas.

Source: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hiv-positive-records-leaked-online-singapore-mikhy-brochez-11175718
« Last Edit: January 28, 2019, 10:48:58 PM by Admin (Rx) »