Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

Have a good day.


Author Topic: Data Protection & Privacy  (Read 377761 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #225 on: April 07, 2026, 06:46:12 PM »
An actual phishing email from Redmart data breach 😢

------------ snip

From: <redmart@trXXXXXX.com>
To: <redmart@trXXXXXX.com>
Subject: Important information about your account password.
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 21:25:57 +0300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
   Hello,

We were unable to reset the password for your trXXXXXX.com account
because there were too many unsuccessful attempts to answer your security questions.
To protect the security of your account, you will not be able to reset your password for the next eight hours.

If you didn't make this change or believe an unauthorized person has accessed your account,
go to support.trXXXXXX.com to reset your password as soon as possible.

Then sign in at trXXXXXX.com to review and update your security settings.

trXXXXXX.com Support.



------------ snip




References
« Last Edit: April 07, 2026, 06:52:54 PM by Admin »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #226 on: May 04, 2026, 11:13:17 PM »
Instructure confirms data breach, ShinyHunters claims attack
By Lawrence Abrams | May 3, 2026

Educational tech giant Instructure has confirmed that data was stolen in a cyberattack, with the ShinyHunters extortion gang claiming responsibility.

Instructure is a U.S.-based education technology company best known for developing Canvas, a widely used learning management system that helps schools, universities, and organizations manage coursework, assignments, and online learning.

On Friday, Instructure disclosed that it suffered a cybersecurity incident and is working with third-party cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to investigate it.

On Saturday, the company issued an update stating that the personal information of users was exposed in the breach.

"While we continue actively investigating, thus far, indications are that the information involved consists of certain identifying information of users at affected institutions, such as names, email addresses, and student ID numbers, as well as messages among users," reads the updated statement.

"At this time, we have found no evidence that passwords, dates of birth, government identifiers, or financial information were involved. If that changes, we will notify any impacted institutions."

As part of the response, Instructure has deployed patches, increased monitoring, and rotated application keys as a precautionary step.

Customers are required to re-authorize access to Instructure's API for new application keys to be issued.

While Instructure has not responded to BleepingComputer's questions about when the breach occurred and whether they were being extorted, the ShinyHunters extortion gang has now listed the company on its data leak site.

"Nearly 9,000 schools worldwide affected. 275 million individuals data ranging from students, teachers, and other staff containing PII," reads the data leak site.

"Several billions of private messages among students and teachers and students and other students involved, containing personal conversations and other PII. Your Salesforce instance was also breached and a lot more other data is involved."

ShinyHunters claimed that the data was stolen from Instructure via a vulnerability in their systems, which has now been patched.

This data allegedly consists of over 240 million records tied to students, teachers, and staff. The threat actor says the data contains students' names, email addresses, enrolled courses, and private messages to teachers.

Data shared by the threat actor indicates that the alleged dataset spans almost 15,000 institutions hosted across multiple geographic regions, including North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

BleepingComputer has not been able to independently confirm which schools or how many individuals were impacted and has contacted Instructure with additional questions about the threat actor's claims.

Source: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/instructure-confirms-data-breach-shinyhunters-claims-attack

Archive: https://archive.fo/SyJRj

Reference 1: "Vishing for Access: Tracking the Expansion of ShinyHunters-Branded SaaS Data Theft", https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/expansion-shinyhunters-saas-data-theft
Archive (R1): https://archive.fo/1OnOd

Reference 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShinyHunters




Students’ names, IDs ‘may have been exposed’ in Canvas cyberattack but passwords, marks safe: NUS
BNB Diviyadhaarshini | May 09, 2026

SINGAPORE – The National University of Singapore (NUS) has informed its students that while some information such as their names and e-mail addresses may have been exposed in a global data breach, their confidential information such as passwords has not been compromised.

NUS was one of many local and international institutions affected by the massive cyberattack on May 7. The attack, claimed by ShinyHunters, a cyberextortion group, saw access to the Canvas learning platform blocked, reported AFP.

In a May 8 e-mail to students about what it called the “data security incident” involving the Canvas “learning management system” seen by The Straits Times, NUS said it was working with Instructure to “thoroughly investigate and assess the situation”.

Instructure is the US-based vendor that owns and runs Canvas.

Attributing the information to Instructure, NUS added that the information “that may have been exposed is limited to: name, e-mail address, student ID”.

“We would like to assure you that your NUS log-in credentials such as passwords have not been compromised, and all student marks remain secure,” it added.

In a reply to queries from The Straits Times on May 9, NUS said: “Operational impact is assessed to be minimal as the current semester has concluded and all examinations have ended.

“We have in place back-up and business continuity processes to ensure downstream activities such as marking and grading proceed unaffected.”

The Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) also told ST on May 9 that “access to Canvas has been restored and there has been no significant disruption to SUSS’ overall operations”.

As an additional precaution, both NUS and SUSS advised students to stay alert and vigilant.

Students were urged not to reply to suspicious e-mails, messages or phone calls, refrain from sharing personal information or log-in details, and to change passwords and enable multi-factor authentication where available.

SUSS added that it was reviewing relevant access controls and security configurations.

The Singapore Institute of Management, the Singapore College of Insurance, the Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants, NTUC LearningHub, The Learning Lab, KLC International Institute and The Learning Space SG were among the other local institutions affected by the data breach.

Thousands of foreign institutions, including Harvard University and Stanford University, were hit by the attack.

Some schools and universities whose students’ data was stolen individually sought to deal directly with the hackers to prevent data release, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on May 8.

In a message allegedly sent by ShinyHunters and seen on forum platform Reddit, the affected institutions were threatened with the release of stolen data.

“If any of the schools in the affected list are interested in preventing the release of their data, please consult a cyberadvisory firm and contact us privately at TOX to negotiate a settlement,” read the statement. TOX refers to a peer-to-peer messaging platform.


Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/students-names-ids-may-have-been-exposed-in-cyber-attack-but-passwords-marks-uncompromised-nus


Archive: https://archive.fo/ZihaG

Reference: https://www.ransomware.live/group/shinyhunters


Reference: https://canvaslostmydata.org


Reference: https://breach.vip


Reference: http://91.215.85.103/pay_or_leak/


Reference: https://github.com/x-aether-x/shinyhunters-threat-intel-report/blob/main/ioc_list.md


Reference (List of Institutions affected): https://web.archive.org/web/20260507042014/http://91.215.85.103/pay_or_leak/instructure_affected_schools_list.txt


8 May 2026: Technical Advisory: ShinyHunters Breach of Instructure Canvas LMS: https://businessinsights.bitdefender.com/technical-advisory-shinyhunters-breach-instructure-canvas-lms






Canvas hack: Company pays criminals to delete students' stolen data
13 May 2025 | Joe TidyCyber correspondent, BBC World Service

The company behind the popular Canvas software, which was hacked last week causing major disruption at thousands of universities and colleges, has paid the hackers not to publish stolen data online.

The cyber-attack affected an estimated 9,000 institutions in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK, with exams disrupted after the Canvas service went down.

The hackers threatened to publish 3.5 terabytes of student and university data they had stolen in the breach.

Instructure, the maker of Canvas, has now confirmed it has "reached an agreement" with the hackers, who have said they deleted the data and promised not to extort any students or institutions.

Paying cyber criminals goes against the advice of law enforcement agencies around the world, as it can fuel further attacks and offers no guarantee the data has been deleted.

In previous cases, criminals have accepted ransom payments but lied about destroying stolen data, instead keeping it for resale.

For example, when the notorious LockBit ransomware group was hacked by the National Crime Agency, police found stolen data had not been deleted even after payments had been made.

Instructure said in a statement on its website that protecting students' and education staff data was its primary motivation.

"While there is never complete certainty when dealing with cyber criminals, we believe it was important to take every step within our control to give customers additional peace of mind, to the extent possible," the company said.

Instructure did not set out the terms of the agreement but said that it meant that:
o the data was returned to the company
o it received "digital confirmation of data destruction"
o it had been informed that no Instructure customers would be extorted as a result of the incident
o the agreement covers all affected customers, with no need for individuals to engage with the hackers

The breach was discovered on 29th April and was claimed online by the prolific Shiny Hunters extortion group.

Neither the hackers nor the company are explicitly saying that money was exchanged, but cyber extortion groups like Shiny Hunters operate by forcing their victims to send money in bitcoin after a negotiation through an encrypted chat service.
A ransom note demanding payment in bitcoin appeared on screens during a cyber-hacking incident on the cloud-based platform Canva.

It is unusual for victims of cyber attacks to publicly acknowledge paying hackers, but Instructure has maintained a high level of transparency, providing regular updates on its website.

That openness may be partly because the attack was highly visible and affected students directly.

Students sitting exams in the US were particularly badly affected, losing access to Canvas for revision and, in some cases, having online exams interrupted.

Aubrey Palmer, a meteorology student at Mississippi State University, told the BBC that they and other students had just finished writing a 2,900‑word exam essay when a ransom message suddenly appeared on their screens.
Courtesy of Aubrey Palmer Meteorology student Aubrey Palmer points to a weather diagram on a blackboard with a piece of chalk while smiling and facing a classroom. Courtesy of Aubrey Palmer

Affected student Aubrey Palmer

The note read: "Shiny Hunters has breached Instructure (again)."

It threatened to release stolen data unless a ransom was paid in bitcoin by Canvas or affected universities.

"My knee‑jerk reaction was that I'd been hacked myself, because that's what it looked like," Aubrey said.

"But then I actually read the ransom note and saw it was Canvas that had been hacked."

Aubrey added dozens of students received the same message, and there was confusion in the exam room about whether their work had been saved.

Mississippi State University later announced some exams would be postponed to allow students to recover any lost work.

Shiny Hunters is known for hacking organisations, stealing data and then publicly pressuring victims to pay ransoms in bitcoin.

The group has been linked to other breaches, including attacks on Jaguar Land Rover and Gucci. The criminals are English‑speaking and believed to be young.

In Telegram messages exchanged with the BBC, Shiny Hunters said it had hacked Canvas twice before last Thursday's attack.

Instructure disclosed a breach in September 2025 in a post on its blog.

Shiny Hunters has also claimed it breached the company again in April 2026, ahead of the 29 April attack.

When asked how it felt about the stress and disruption caused to students like Aubrey Palmer, the group said: "We have no comment on that."

It would not say how much it had been paid by Instructure.


Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdepzg83x87o


Archive: https://archive.fo/rSrMN
« Last Edit: May 13, 2026, 02:10:45 PM by Admin »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #227 on: May 05, 2026, 02:51:10 PM »
LTA circular to potential EV charger owners reveals hundreds of e-mail addresses under carbon copy feature
Derryn Wong | May 5, 2026

[SINGAPORE] More than 350 e-mail addresses of individuals were shown to all recipients of an e-mail circular from the Land Transport Authority (LTA) sent on Monday (May 4).

The message, seen by The Business Times, was sent at around 5.50 pm by the authority’s National Electric Vehicle Centre (NEVC) to inform potential owners of private electric vehicle chargers about a new digital service on the OneMotoring platform to register EV chargers with the authority.

It was sent with addresses under the carbon copy feature instead of blind carbon copy (bcc), meaning that all recipients could see all the other e-mail addresses in the chain.

A follow-up e-mail was sent at 10.44 pm to apologise for inadvertently disclosing the e-mail addresses.

Lim Yong Xian, deputy director of EV regulations at NEVC, said: “The staff involved has been counselled and advised to exercise greater care in handling such information. We have since reinforced our processes to ensure that recipients’ e-mail addresses are placed in the ‘bcc’ field in future, to prevent a recurrence.”

BT has queried LTA on the matter.


Source: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapore/lta-circular-potential-ev-charger-owners-reveals-hundreds-e-mail-addresses-under-carbon-copy-feature


Archive: https://archive.md/wip/A4ReC

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #228 on: May 14, 2026, 11:07:30 PM »
ChatGPT Gave Out My Address and Phone Number
By Matt Novak | May 13, 2026

Back in the 20th century, every city in America distributed a very large book to everyone’s home with a near-complete list of phone numbers and addresses for the people who lived there.

It was called a phone book and it was considered an extremely normal way to find contact information. Fast forward to 2026, and knowing someone’s address or phone number is considered some of the most intimate knowledge anyone can possess about you.

Eileen Guo at MIT Technology Review has a new article about the rising concern over AI chatbots giving out phone numbers. The assumption is that personally identifiable information (PII) is being used in training data, which allows anyone to request the numbers lodged deep in the machine, as it were.

Guo writes about some people who’ve been inundated with wrong numbers, including a software developer in Israel who started getting customer service calls after Gemini was giving out his number.

Weird mistakes are one issue, and a predictable one given AI’s error rate. Perhaps more concerning for the average person is the possibility of AI chatbots giving out their real phone number. I tested out various chatbots to see what they’d say if I requested my own phone number.

ChatGPT

ChatGPT accurately delivered a real phone number that I haven’t had in a few years. But it was a number that I had for many, many years before moving to Australia. The chatbot noted that, “I can’t verify whether that number is still current or active.”

It appears to have pulled the number from a PDF of a FOIA request that I made to the FTC back in 2016. I also asked ChatGPT for Matt Novak’s address, which was also in that obscure document. The AI chatbot happily volunteered that as well, though I no longer live there.

When I prompted it for another phone number for Matt Novak in California, it gave the number for a different Matt Novak in the Los Angeles area. But it seemed to have no qualms with doing the search and delivering real numbers.

Grok

Grok refused to hand over the phone number, despite my repeated pleas that it was needed for a life or death situation. Grok also recognized that I was asking for my own phone number, something the other chatbots never mentioned.

Claude

Claude told me that, “Sharing private contact details of individuals — including journalists — raises serious privacy concerns.” After telling Claude that Matt Novak had previously given me his phone number but I had forgotten it, the chatbot still refused.

Perplexity

Perplexity refused to give out my phone number and when it listed my email, it was censored with the words [email protected]. Curiously, Perplexity had no problem handing out my Signal user name. Despite repeated badgering, Perplexity refused to hand over the phone number.

Gemini

Gemini also refused and directed people to try my professional email address (mnovak@gizmodo.com) as well as my personal one (matt@paleofuture.com), both of which have been listed publicly with my consent all over the internet.

When I asked Gemini whose phone number is 818-925-4375, it correctly answered, “That phone number belongs to the journalist Matt Novak.” But don’t worry, that’s the number I do give out freely. None of the other AI chatbots would give up info on who that number belongs to. It’s me. But I consider it a little like my spam-line inbox.

It’s kind of funny that the entire idea of privacy has been flipped on its head over the past 20 years or so. Sharing your most intimate private moments or vacation photos on platforms like Instagram seems like no big deal. Back in the 1990s, that kind of wide exposure may have felt violating. But here in 2026, your phone number is a closely guarded secret.

And that’s not necessarily wrong or weird. It’s just how culture can shift over time. Privacy is ultimately a social construct.

Source: https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-gave-out-my-address-and-phone-number-2000758330

Archive: https://archive.fo/jHCcz[/email]

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #229 on: July 26, 2026, 02:28:17 PM »
AI-specific notifications mandatory for firms using personal data to train AI models: PDPC
Lee Li Ying | Jul 20, 2026

SINGAPORE – From July 20, organisations in Singapore will need to inform consumers when they use personal data to train generative artificial intelligence models, as the nation seeks to promote greater transparency and accountability.

“As more organisations develop, adapt or deploy generative AI tools, we must address the question of accountability,” said Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo, announcing the move at the Singapore Data Festival on July 20.

Singapore Data Festival was formerly known as Personal Data Protection Week, with the last run in 2025. The event has since been rebranded to reflect the broader role of data and AI in the digital economy.

The new measure, called AI-specific notifications, is set out in the advisory guidelines on the use of personal data in generative AI systems.

The guidelines were released by the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) on July 20 following a month-long public consultation from June 2 to July 1.

The PDPC explained in the advisory guidelines that the AI-specific notifications are needed because there are risks that sensitive personal data – like children’s data, and health and credit records – could be exposed or reconstructed from generative AI models. It could be difficult to remove or correct information once it has been used to train a model.

Personal data comprises everything from names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses to voice recordings, photographs, biometric information, and financial and transaction records.

In the past, organisations could rely on broad privacy notices if they use personal data for “new product development” or “personalisation of services”.

Even though AI-specific notices are mandatory, the PDPC did not prescribe the content of such notices or where to place them, but recommended that companies explain the types of data used through in-app pop-ups or dedicated webpages. Channels for consumers to opt out or withdraw their consent are also not mandatory.

When call centres use call recordings to train AI models, a privacy policy or script update will suffice. AI-specific notifications are not required when anonymised personal data is used for AI training.

Organisations, including banks, insurers and social media platforms, are not allowed to decline services to consumers if they say no to AI training.

A separate set of voluntary guidelines released on July 20 also urges AI chatbot providers to disclose information such as their systems’ capabilities, limitations, reliability and safety measures.

These are AI assistants designed for public use, ranging from general-purpose chatbots developed by frontier AI companies to specialised assistants offered by businesses such as banks, airlines, insurers and retailers.

Such chatbots are the most commonly used generative AI application for users, but many may not know the chatbots’ limitations or what happens to the data they input.

“The information usually exists. But it is scattered across terms of service, privacy notices and other documents, and is often either too simplistic or too technical for ordinary users,” said Teo.

Thus, the guidelines recommend a “chatbot information card” – akin to a medicinal product label – that provides users with key information about an AI chatbot in a single place. It can take different forms, such as a dedicated information page or a disclosure document.

Teo pointed out that medicinal product labels do not list every scientific detail but tell people the essentials of what the drug is for, how to take it, how much is recommended, the side effects to watch for and when not to use it.

“The information card is meant to work the same way. It sets out in plain language what the chatbot is for, what it is not for, how data may be handled and how users can report issues,” said Teo.

Big tech companies like Google and Meta, as well as local giants like DBS Bank, OCBC Bank, Singapore Airlines and Synapxe, will be rolling out their own versions of the chatbot information cards over the next 12 months.

DBS has two chatbots – Joy, which provides 24/7 support for corporate clients, and digibot, which handles banking queries like checking account balances and loan enquiries. Both clearly inform users they are interacting with a generative AI-powered service and provide the option to speak to a human operator.

“We welcome IMDA’s pragmatic approach to balancing transparency with implementation flexibility that will help strengthen trust in AI across the ecosystem and advance Singapore’s ambition to be a trusted AI financial hub,” said Derrick Goh, group chief operating officer at DBS.

Teo said that for Google, the company will be consolidating key information about its flagship AI chatbot Gemini, while Meta will provide clear and accessible information about its AI-powered products.

Public sector agencies like the National Library Board and Health Promotion Board will also be adopting the guidelines.

“The companies I mentioned are early adopters who are demonstrating leadership in data and AI governance. We hope many more will follow,” said Teo.

The data protection conference takes place from July 20 to 24 at the Sands Expo and Convention Centre.

Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/tech/ai-specific-notifications-mandatory-for-firms-using-personal-data-to-train-ai-models-pdpc

Archive: https://archive.fo/XZ5L8

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #230 on: September 18, 2026, 03:20:16 PM »
Cybersecurity incident affected 48 mosques, four madrasahs; no ransom paid: MUIS
The incident, which was first reported earlier in the week, involved a human resources and payroll system.
Darcel Al Anthony | 17 Sep 2026

SINGAPORE: No ransom was paid following a cybersecurity incident involving software vendor Avelogic, the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) said on Thursday (Sep 17).

The incident, first reported on Tuesday, affected Avelogic's human resources and payroll system and clients across different sectors. In the community sector, this included 48 mosques, four madrasahs, the Islamic Learning Hub and Management Office and Mosque-Madrasah-Wakaf Shared Services, MUIS said.

A police report was made, and Avelogic is continuing to investigate the incident and its wider impact, MUIS said.

The council added that it was “concerned” about the impact on the affected organisations and their employees and that it was working with those affected to ensure salaries would continue to be paid on time.

"Alternative payroll arrangements are already in place, and there has been no disruption to religious or public-facing services," said MUIS.

Avelogic has since recovered the affected data and engaged independent cybersecurity experts to investigate the incident.

Based on investigations so far, there is no evidence that a large amount of data was taken from the system, MUIS said. Data stored in the affected system is also encrypted as an additional layer of protection.

Investigations and security checks are ongoing, and the system will only resume operations after the relevant safeguards and checks have been completed.

"MUIS will continue to support the affected community sector organisations to ensure essential HR and payroll functions continue without disruption," the council said.

MUIS told CNA on Tuesday that the incident did not affect the delivery of public-facing or government services. It did not reveal the number of people affected or what information may have been compromised.

Separately, Avelogic published a cybersecurity incident notice concerning its SmartHRMS system, which it described as a payroll and human resources management system for enterprises.

In an update on Monday, the company said an independent forensic investigation found no evidence of bulk data exfiltration, based on available Amazon Web Services network telemetry covering confirmed threat actor activity from Aug 30 to Aug 31.

Avelogic did not identify affected customers. It said sensitive data fields within SmartHRMS remained protected by application-layer encryption.

The company filed a police report on Aug 31 and notified the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC). A PDPC spokesperson told CNA on Wednesday that it was investigating the data breach notification filed.

Avelogic appointed cybersecurity firm Black Panda on Sep 3 to conduct a forensic investigation. It added that it had recovered the latest data set and aimed to have its new system running by Friday.

Source: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/muis-ransomware-payroll-mosques-cybersecurity-6391666

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #231 on: October 01, 2026, 09:48:44 PM »
More than 23,500 Simba customers affected in data breach involving IC numbers, birth dates
27 Sep 2026

SINGAPORE: Telecommunications company Simba has suffered a data breach affecting 23,549 customers, involving names, identity card numbers and dates of birth.

Based on the company's investigations so far, the data affected also included mobile numbers and email addresses of customers who had registered for Simba's services.

In a statement on Friday (Sep 25), Simba said it had discovered the incident a day earlier and had since resolved it.

No credit card or bank account information is "at risk", the company said.

The company added that there was currently no indication that any of the affected data had been "maliciously misused".

"Simba is treating this incident seriously and have swiftly resolved it.

"We have also taken immediate and appropriate actions to review existing security measures to protect core infrastructure and systems," it said, adding that it was working with the relevant authorities on the incident.

The company is also progressively notifying affected customers via email, with the process expected to be completed within the next week.

In response to CNA's queries, the Personal Data Protection Commission said it was aware of the incident and was investigating.

Source: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/more-23500-simba-customers-affected-in-data-breach-involving-ic-numbers-birth-dates-6413636

Archive: https://archive.li/JlIjU

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Full-time Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,953
  • May all beings be well and happy.
Re: Data Protection & Privacy
« Reply #232 on: October 01, 2026, 10:02:53 PM »
Nearly 100,000 affected as Bee Cheng Hiang suffers Singapore's first AI-related data breach
October 01, 2026 | Asyiqin Nadzri

Nearly 100,000 Bee Cheng Hiang customers had their email addresses exposed after an employee used an AI tool to generate code for a mass marketing email.

The incident is reportedly Singapore's first AI-related data breach notified to the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC).

The incident took place on April 25. Bee Cheng Hiang notified the PDPC two days later.

PDPC Commission accepted a voluntary undertaking by Bee Cheng Hiang in September, to improve its compliance with the Personal Data Protection Act 2012.

The email was sent out in batches of about 1,000 customers, so recipients were able to see the email addresses of other people in the same batch.

Insufficient AI prompt
Bee Cheng Hiang said the employee had used a generative AI tool to help create a programme for sending marketing emails from a local mailing list.

However, the instructions given to the AI did not specify that recipients' email addresses should be hidden from one another.

The resulting code therefore caused multiple customers' addresses to appear in the same email.

The PDPC said the incident was not caused by a malfunction in the AI tool, but by human error in developing the email distribution code.

The affected email addresses were the only personal data involved, and the PDPC said there was no evidence that they were subsequently misused.

The employee had tested the programme before it was deployed, but only checked activity logs instead of examining the content of an actual test email.

This meant the problem was not detected before the marketing emails were sent.

Company introduces additional checks
Bee Cheng Hiang, which is known for their bak kwa, stopped the bulk email distribution after discovering the issue, corrected the code and informed affected customers.

The company has since introduced a requirement for at least two employees to check all bulk email communications before they are sent, according to the PDPC.

The PDPC also noted that this was Bee Cheng Hiang's first attempt at incorporating AI tools into its business operations.

Following the incident, the company gave a voluntary undertaking to improve its compliance with the Personal Data Protection Act. The PDPC accepted the undertaking on Sept 2.

As part of the undertaking, Bee Cheng Hiang will establish a framework governing employees' use of AI for coding.

This includes requiring independent technical reviews of AI-generated code that involves personal data.

The company will also strengthen its software testing procedures, including testing emails using dummy accounts before deployment.

It plans to formalise its response to the incident into a data breach procedure, as well as introduce automated measures to prevent emails containing multiple addresses from being sent in a single email field.

PDPC urges businesses to assess risks before using AI
The PDPC reportedly said organisations should conduct appropriate data protection impact assessments before adopting AI tools to improve business processes.

It also recommended that companies establish clear policies and processes, alongside testing and review mechanisms, to ensure employees use AI responsibly and protect personal data.

The case highlights that while AI may be used to assist with coding and other business functions, organisations remain responsible for checking how AI-generated outputs handle personal data before putting them into use.

Source: https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/pm-wong-urges-economists-stay-grounded-ai-advances

Archive: https://archive.li/iS9yV